AI Agents in 2026: Building Autonomous Agentic Workflows
on Ai agents, Llm, Autonomous systems, Claude, Gpt, Multi-agent, Automation
AI agents have evolved from simple Q&A bots to autonomous systems that can browse the web, write code, manage files, and coordinate with other agents. In 2026, building agentic workflows is becoming a core skill for developers.
Photo by Steve Johnson on Unsplash
What Makes an AI Agent Different from a Chatbot?
A chatbot responds to prompts. An agent takes action. The key differences:
| Aspect | Chatbot | AI Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Interaction | Single turn | Multi-step |
| Tools | None | File, web, API, code |
| Memory | Session only | Persistent |
| Autonomy | Reactive | Proactive |
# Traditional chatbot
response = llm.complete("What's the weather?")
# AI Agent with tools
agent = Agent(
llm=claude_opus,
tools=[web_search, file_read, code_execute],
memory=persistent_memory
)
result = agent.run("Research competitors and create a report")
The Agentic Loop Pattern
Every agent follows a similar loop:
Observe → Think → Act → Observe → ...
Photo by Luke Chesser on Unsplash
Implementation Example
class Agent:
def __init__(self, llm, tools, memory):
self.llm = llm
self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
self.memory = memory
def run(self, task: str) -> str:
self.memory.add("task", task)
while True:
# Think
context = self.memory.get_relevant(task)
response = self.llm.complete(
f"Task: {task}\nContext: {context}\n"
f"Available tools: {list(self.tools.keys())}\n"
"Decide: use a tool or respond with DONE: <answer>"
)
# Check if done
if response.startswith("DONE:"):
return response[5:].strip()
# Act
tool_name, args = parse_tool_call(response)
result = self.tools[tool_name].execute(**args)
self.memory.add("tool_result", result)
Multi-Agent Architectures
Single agents hit limits. Multi-agent systems divide work:
Orchestrator Pattern
One “manager” agent delegates to specialist agents:
orchestrator = Agent(role="manager")
researcher = Agent(role="research", tools=[web_search])
coder = Agent(role="coding", tools=[code_execute])
writer = Agent(role="writing", tools=[file_write])
# Orchestrator decides who does what
orchestrator.delegate([researcher, coder, writer], task)
Debate Pattern
Agents critique each other’s work:
proposer = Agent(role="propose_solution")
critic = Agent(role="find_flaws")
solution = proposer.run(problem)
for round in range(3):
critique = critic.run(f"Find issues in: {solution}")
solution = proposer.run(f"Improve based on: {critique}")
Tool Design Best Practices
Agents are only as good as their tools:
- Clear descriptions - The LLM needs to understand when to use each tool
- Atomic operations - One tool, one job
- Informative errors - Help the agent recover
- Guardrails - Limit blast radius
@tool(description="Search the web for current information. Use for facts, news, or recent events.")
def web_search(query: str, max_results: int = 5) -> list[dict]:
"""Returns list of {title, url, snippet}"""
try:
results = brave_api.search(query, count=max_results)
return [{"title": r.title, "url": r.url, "snippet": r.snippet}
for r in results]
except RateLimitError:
return {"error": "Rate limited. Wait 60 seconds and retry."}
Memory Systems for Agents
Long-running agents need memory:
Short-term (Context Window)
- Recent conversation
- Current task state
Long-term (Vector DB + Files)
- Past interactions
- Learned preferences
- Project knowledge
class AgentMemory:
def __init__(self, vector_db, file_store):
self.short_term = [] # Last N messages
self.vector_db = vector_db # Semantic search
self.files = file_store # Structured data
def get_relevant(self, query: str) -> str:
# Combine recent context + semantic search
recent = self.short_term[-10:]
similar = self.vector_db.search(query, top_k=5)
return format_context(recent, similar)
Production Considerations
Cost Control
Agents can burn through tokens fast. Implement budgets:
agent = Agent(
llm=llm,
max_tokens_per_task=50000,
max_tool_calls=20,
timeout_seconds=300
)
Observability
Log everything:
- Each LLM call and response
- Tool invocations and results
- Decision points
Human-in-the-Loop
For high-stakes actions, require approval:
@tool(requires_approval=True)
def send_email(to: str, subject: str, body: str):
# Agent must get human approval before this runs
...
Frameworks to Explore
- LangGraph - State machines for agents
- CrewAI - Multi-agent orchestration
- AutoGen - Microsoft’s agent framework
- OpenClaw - Personal AI agent platform
The Future: Ambient Agents
The next evolution: agents that run continuously, watching for opportunities to help without being asked. They monitor your calendar, emails, and projects—then act when appropriate.
We’re moving from “AI assistant” to “AI colleague.”
Building agents in 2026? Start simple: one agent, clear tools, persistent memory. Complexity comes later.
이 글이 도움이 되셨다면 공감 및 광고 클릭을 부탁드립니다 :)
