Platform Engineering in 2026: Building Internal Developer Platforms That Work

on Platform engineering, Devops, Developer experience, Idp, Backstage, Kubernetes



Platform engineering has emerged as the answer to DevOps complexity. Instead of expecting every developer to be a Kubernetes expert, platform teams build internal developer platforms (IDPs) that abstract away infrastructure while maintaining flexibility.

Team collaboration Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

The Problem Platform Engineering Solves

DevOps promised developer empowerment. Reality delivered:

  • 50+ tools to learn
  • YAML sprawl across repos
  • Weeks to provision infrastructure
  • “Works on my machine” extended to “works in my namespace”

The cognitive load crushed productivity. Platform engineering flips the script: Build once, serve many.

Core Components of an IDP

1. Service Catalog (Backstage)

Backstage provides a single pane of glass for all services:

# catalog-info.yaml in each repo
apiVersion: backstage.io/v1alpha1
kind: Component
metadata:
  name: order-service
  description: Handles order processing and fulfillment
  annotations:
    github.com/project-slug: myorg/order-service
    pagerduty.com/service-id: P123ABC
    datadoghq.com/dashboard: orders-main
spec:
  type: service
  owner: team-commerce
  lifecycle: production
  dependsOn:
    - component:payment-service
    - resource:orders-db

Engineers find services, see ownership, and access docs in one place.

2. Golden Paths (Templates)

Self-service templates encode best practices:

# backstage template for new Python service
apiVersion: scaffolder.backstage.io/v1beta3
kind: Template
metadata:
  name: python-service
  title: Python Microservice
spec:
  owner: platform-team
  type: service
  parameters:
    - title: Service Info
      required: [name, owner]
      properties:
        name:
          title: Service Name
          type: string
          pattern: '^[a-z0-9-]+$'
        owner:
          title: Owner Team
          type: string
          ui:field: OwnerPicker
        database:
          title: Database
          type: string
          enum: [none, postgres, redis]
          default: none
  steps:
    - id: fetch-template
      action: fetch:template
      input:
        url: ./skeleton
        values:
          name: $
          owner: $
    
    - id: create-repo
      action: publish:github
      input:
        repoUrl: github.com?owner=myorg&repo=$
    
    - id: register-catalog
      action: catalog:register
      input:
        repoContentsUrl: $

New services get CI/CD, monitoring, and deployment configured automatically.

3. Infrastructure Abstraction

Hide Kubernetes complexity behind simple interfaces:

# What developers write (Platform API)
apiVersion: platform.company.io/v1
kind: Application
metadata:
  name: order-service
spec:
  image: gcr.io/myorg/order-service:v1.2.3
  replicas: 3
  resources:
    cpu: 500m
    memory: 512Mi
  database:
    type: postgres
    size: small
  ingress:
    host: orders.api.company.io

# What the platform generates (Kubernetes resources)
# Deployment, Service, Ingress, HPA, PDB, NetworkPolicy,
# ServiceMonitor, ConfigMap, Secret references, etc.

Architecture diagram Photo by Marvin Meyer on Unsplash

Building with Crossplane

Crossplane extends Kubernetes to manage any infrastructure:

# Define a composite resource for databases
apiVersion: apiextensions.crossplane.io/v1
kind: CompositeResourceDefinition
metadata:
  name: databases.platform.company.io
spec:
  group: platform.company.io
  names:
    kind: Database
    plural: databases
  versions:
    - name: v1
      served: true
      referenceable: true
      schema:
        openAPIV3Schema:
          type: object
          properties:
            spec:
              type: object
              properties:
                engine:
                  type: string
                  enum: [postgres, mysql]
                size:
                  type: string
                  enum: [small, medium, large]
---
# Composition - what actually gets created
apiVersion: apiextensions.crossplane.io/v1
kind: Composition
metadata:
  name: database-aws
spec:
  compositeTypeRef:
    apiVersion: platform.company.io/v1
    kind: Database
  resources:
    - name: rds-instance
      base:
        apiVersion: rds.aws.crossplane.io/v1beta1
        kind: Instance
        spec:
          forProvider:
            engine: postgres
            instanceClass: db.t3.medium
            allocatedStorage: 20
      patches:
        - fromFieldPath: spec.size
          toFieldPath: spec.forProvider.instanceClass
          transforms:
            - type: map
              map:
                small: db.t3.small
                medium: db.t3.medium
                large: db.t3.large

Developers request a database; Crossplane provisions it in AWS/GCP/Azure.

Developer Experience Metrics

Track these to measure platform success:

# Platform metrics dashboard
panels:
  - title: Time to First Deployment
    description: How long from repo creation to production
    target: < 1 hour
    
  - title: Deployment Frequency
    description: How often teams deploy per week
    target: > 10/week
    
  - title: Lead Time for Changes
    description: Commit to production
    target: < 1 day
    
  - title: Change Failure Rate
    description: % deployments causing incidents
    target: < 5%
    
  - title: MTTR
    description: Mean time to recovery
    target: < 1 hour
    
  - title: Developer Satisfaction (NPS)
    description: Quarterly survey
    target: > 50

Common Anti-Patterns

1. Building Everything Custom

❌ Don’t build a custom service mesh, CI system, and observability stack.

✅ Use open-source foundations (Backstage, Argo, Crossplane) and customize.

2. Ignoring Developer Feedback

# Bad: Platform team assumes what developers need
# Good: Continuous feedback loop

def platform_development_cycle():
    while True:
        pain_points = survey_developers()
        prioritized = rank_by_impact(pain_points)
        
        for feature in prioritized[:3]:
            prototype = build_mvp(feature)
            feedback = alpha_test(prototype, volunteer_teams)
            
            if feedback.positive:
                ship_to_all()
            else:
                iterate_or_kill(prototype)
        
        measure_metrics()

3. Mandating Without Value

Forced adoption breeds resentment. Make the platform so good that teams choose it.

4. Over-Abstraction

Some teams need escape hatches. Allow raw Kubernetes when necessary:

apiVersion: platform.company.io/v1
kind: Application
metadata:
  name: special-case-service
spec:
  # Standard platform config
  image: gcr.io/myorg/service:v1
  replicas: 3
  
  # Escape hatch for edge cases
  rawResources:
    - apiVersion: v1
      kind: ConfigMap
      metadata:
        name: custom-config
      data:
        special: "value"

Team Structure

Platform engineering needs dedicated investment:

Platform Team (5-8 engineers)
├── Core Platform (2-3)
│   ├── Kubernetes infrastructure
│   ├── Crossplane compositions
│   └── Security policies
├── Developer Experience (2-3)
│   ├── Backstage development
│   ├── Templates and golden paths
│   └── Documentation
└── Reliability (1-2)
    ├── Observability stack
    ├── SLO management
    └── Incident tooling

Getting Started

  1. Survey developers: What causes the most friction?
  2. Pick one pain point: Don’t boil the ocean
  3. Build an MVP: Solve that one thing well
  4. Measure impact: Time saved, satisfaction improved
  5. Iterate: Add capabilities based on demand

Conclusion

Platform engineering is not about building the perfect platform—it’s about continuously reducing developer friction. Start with the biggest pain point, build just enough abstraction, and iterate based on real feedback.

The best platforms feel invisible. Developers deploy code, infrastructure appears, and they never think about YAML. That’s the goal.

Resources:


이 글이 도움이 되셨다면 공감 및 광고 클릭을 부탁드립니다 :)